Search for: All records

Cooperatively breeding vertebrates typically live in family groups in which some offspring delay breeding and remain on the natal territory to help rear younger siblings. However, field studies find that helpers can have a neutral or even negative effect on the survival of their relatives. Why, then, do helpers remain, and why do parents tolerate them? Here, we use a kin selection approach to model the conditions under which tolerating helpers is adaptive to parents. Unlike previous models, we consider scenarios in which relatives compete for breeding opportunities in a saturated habitat. We show that kin competition is sufficient to favour tolerance of helpers, even when helpers decrease parental survival or fecundity. Helping is additionally favoured when delaying dispersal benefits the helper (either by decreasing the costs of dispersal or by increasing the chance of territory inheritance). This suggests that the division of reproduction in cooperative family groups can emerge for reasons unrelated to the effects of help itself, but the resulting society sets the stage for more elaborate forms of division of labour. Kin-based helping may therefore be adaptive not only because helpers are related to the brood whom they help, but also because delayed breeding reduces reproductive conflict among siblings. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Division of labour as a key driver of social evolution’. 

Nest predation rates critically influence avian biodiversity and evolution. In the north temperate zone, increased nest failure along edges of forest fragments is hypothesized to play a major role in the disappearance of bird species from disturbed landscapes. However, we lack comprehensive syntheses from tropical latitudes, where biodiversity is highest and increasingly threatened by habitat fragmentation and disturbance. We assembled data from five decades of field studies across the global tropics (1,112 populations of 661 species) and used phylogenetic models to evaluate proposed predictors of nest success. We found significant effects of several traits, including adult body mass and nest architecture. Contrary to results from many temperate locations, anthropogenic habitat disruption did not consistently reduce nest success; in fact, raw nest success rates were lower in large tracts of primary forest than in disturbed or fragmented landscapes. Follow-up analyses within species, using a subset of 76 species for which we had estimates of nest survival in habitats with different levels of disruption, confirmed that neither disturbance nor fragmentation significantly influenced nest success. These results suggest that nest predation alone cannot explain observed declines in avian biodiversity in tropical forest fragments, raising new questions about the demographic processes that drive extinction in the tropics.